1. With this chapter, we
resume the tour of democracy that we started last year.
2. An intelligent
sharing of power among a legislature, executive and judiciary is very important
to the design of a democracy.
3. We start with two
stories from Belgium and Sri Lanka.
4. Both these stories
are about how democracies handle demands for power sharing.
Belgium and Sri Lanka:
1. Belgium is a small
country in Europe.
2. It has borders with
Netherlands, France and Germany.
3. 59% in the Flemish
region speaks Dutch.
4. Another 40% people
live in Wallonia region and speaks French.
5. Remaining 1% of the
Belgians speak Germany.
6. In the capital city
Brussels, 80% people speak French while 20% are Dutch – speaking.
7. The minority French –
speaking community was relatively rich and powerful.
8. This was resented by
the Dutch-speaking community who got the benefit of the economic development
and education much later.
9. The tension between
two communities was acuter in Brussels.
10. Like other nations
in the south Asia region, Sri Lanka has a diverse population.
11. The Sinhala speaks
are 74% and Tamil speakers are 18%
12. Among Tamils, there
are two sub groups, Tamil natives of the country are called “Sri Lankan
Tamils”; the rest whose forefathers came from India as a population workers
during the colonial period, is called ‘Indian Tamils’.
Majoritarianism in Sri Lanka:
1. Sri Lankan emerged as
an independent country in 1948.
2. The leaders of the
Sinhala community sought to secure dominance over the government by virtue of
their majority.
3. In 1956, an Act was
passed to recognize Sinhala as the only official language, thus disregarding
Tamil.
4. A new constitution
stipulated that the state shall protect and foster Buddhism.
5. All these coming
measures, coming one after the other, gradually increased the feeling of
alienation among the Sri Lankan Tamils.
6. As a result, the
relations between the Sinhala and Tamil communities strained over time.
7. The Sri Lankan Tamils
launched parties and struggles.
8. But their demand for
more autonomy to provinces populated by the Tamils was repeatedly denied.
9. The distrust between
the two communities turned into widespread conflict. It soon turned into CIVIL
WAR.
10. The civil war caused
a terrible setback to the social, cultural and economic life of the country.
Accommodation in Belgium:
1. Belgium recognized
the existence of regional differences and cultural diversities.
2. Between 1970 and 1993,
they amended their constitution four times so as to work out an arrangement
that would enable everyone to live together within the same country.
3. Here are some of the
elements of the Belgian model:
a. Constitution prescribes that the number of Dutch and French-speaking ministers shall be equal in the central government.
b. Many powers of the central government have been given to states government of the two of the regions of the country.
c. Brussels has separated government in which both the communities have equal representation.
d. Apart from the central and state government, there is a third kind of government. This is community government.
a. Constitution prescribes that the number of Dutch and French-speaking ministers shall be equal in the central government.
b. Many powers of the central government have been given to states government of the two of the regions of the country.
c. Brussels has separated government in which both the communities have equal representation.
d. Apart from the central and state government, there is a third kind of government. This is community government.
4. In Belgium, the
leaders have realized that the unity of the country is possible only by
respecting the feelings and interests of different communities and regions.
5. Sri Lanka shows us a
contrasting example. It shows us that if a majority community wants to force
its dominance over others and refuses to share power, it can undermine the
unity of the country.
Why is power sharing desirable?
1. Thus, two different
sets of reasons can be given in favor of power sharing.
2. Firstly, power
sharing is good because it helps to reduce the possibility of conflict between
social groups.
3. There is a second,
deeper reason why power sharing is good for democracy. Power sharing is very
spirit of democracy. A democratic rule involves sharing power with those
affected by its exercise, and who have to live with it effects.
4. Let us call the first
set of reasons PRUDENTIAL and the second moral.
5. While prudential
reasons stress that power sharing will bring out better outcomes, moral reasons
emphasizes the very act of the power sharing as valuable.
Forms of power sharing:
1. The idea of power
sharing has emerged in opposition to the notions of undivided political power.
2. For a long time, it
was believed that all power of a government must reside in one person or group
of a person located at one place.
3. One basic principle
of power sharing is that people are the source of all political power.
4. In a good democratic
government, due respect is given to diverse groups and views that exist in a
society.
5. Everyone has a voice
in the shaping of public politics.
6. Therefore, it follows
that in a democracy political power should be distributed among as many
citizens as possible.
Let us look at some of the most common arrangements that we have
or will come across.
1. Power is shared among
different organs of the government, such as the legislature, executive, and
judiciary. Let us call this horizontal distribution of power because it allows
different organs of the government placed at the same level to exercise
different powers.
2. Power can be shared
among governments at different levels – a general government for the entire
country and governments at the provincial or regional level. The division of
higher and lower levels of government is called the vertical division of power.
3. Power may also be
shared among different social groups, such as the religious and linguistic
groups. ‘Community government’ is a good example of this arrangement.
4. Power sharing
arrangement can also be seen in the way political parties, pressure groups and
movements control or influence those in power.
No comments:
Post a Comment